A pozitív gondolatok és érzelmek segítenek változni.
A Look At J. Crew Blocker Provisions In Loan Agreements
november 27, 2020
The largest investment banks reported a tenfold increase in annual losses from derivatives transactions in the first quarter, a taste of how these activities could reduce profitability in trading units this year and even force some to reassess their presence in these markets. According to Amrit Shahani, director of research at the analytics firm Coalition, losses on the 12 largest investment banks were less than $4 billion in the first three months of the year. This benefited from the splendour of a holprand quarter for most of the banks` business units, whose annual revenue increases rose from more than 32% including losses to 14%. The magnitude of the losses – which relate mainly to provisions against a possible increase in customer defaults and higher bank financing rates – shows the flashing cost that banks can bring for these complex products, as market volatility increases. Analysts say fees will remain a priority in the coming quarters, in part because of the spreads in the level of provisions that various banks have made. “This will be important when considering the impact of these royalties on their performance. It is changing its market share, changing its ranking and shareholder return on equity,” Shahani said. “Some banks that were conservative when booking these fees might be better as the quarters go by, while those that were more optimistic might end up looking much worse.” Paul Hamill, FICC`s global distribution manager at Citadel Securities, which competes with banks that trade products such as bonds and derivatives, suggested that losses could even lead some banks to re-evaluate their operations. “What we always see after such crises is that some banks are reconsidering their positions in these markets, either because they have lost more money than expected or they are simply realizing that the commitment of the capital to participate is not an opportunity,” he said. SUBSTANTIAL RISKS Although derivatives trading is generally a lucrative activity for banks, it also carries risks that go well beyond the increase or decrease in the value of a position.
Counterparty risk is primarily the risk of bankruptcy of the business on the other side of the business. Derivative contracts are often long and bind a bank to its customers for years or even decades. Most transactions go through intermediaries known as clearing houses to combat counterparty risk, but many clients, such as corporate treasurers, act directly with banks to avoid having to post large margins when a trade moves against them. Non-margin poses a major problem for the bank and leaves it open to losses if markets plunge as they did at the beginning of this year. Instead, the bank must assess the likelihood that a customer will be late in payment over the duration of a trading, and that this is a so-called credit rating adjustment in the way it votes the position. The Bank also adds a financing valuation adjustment to account for the periods during which it lends (or loans) to the client during the course of a trading – a common feature of long-term derivatives. “CVA and FVA figures are generally important for all banks with a large derivatives business,” says Jon Gregory, senior advisor at the consulting firm Solum Financial, who has written in detail on the subject.